A reader left me a comment that ExpressVPN’s officially recommended method is temporarily unavailable, but today’s test revealed that it still works. This may be due to different parameters depending on the region, device, and ISP. If you are unable to use the officially recommended “Auto+4 Servers” method for wall-climbing, then you can try IKEv2 for your connection. In fact, ExpressVPN also supports manual configuration of the connection…

Today again, I’ll be running live tests on 7 of the most commonly used VPN wall-flipping tools in China. Usage of each VPN in China. If I find more suitable flip wall VPNs, I will also add them to the list, and hopefully, this test will help you use them on a regular basis! Serves as a bit of a reference. If you have any questions, drop me a line, not only will I answer you, but other dedicated readers will help you with the problems you encounter…

Today’s test device is Windows 10, and a total of 7 VPNs are tested against each other. The main test dimensions are server connection success rate, protocol usage, server connection aging, and speed after wall connection. At the same time, a number of VPNs used YouTube+SpeedTest to measure the speed. If I get good feedback from you, I will consider using this method for all VPN speed tests in the future! In that case, the test data will be more informative…

Today will be a more comprehensive test of ExpressVPN, which includes 3 devices. Also from the results, the biggest surprise from today’s test was the discovery that the SurfsharkVPN app is already in The direct connection is now available in some devices and the server has a very good connection success rate and speed. But for SF, I think we should observe it for a while to see how its long-term stability is. Short-term connection success doesn’t mean anything, after that, it’s the key to have long-term stable and safe use, I’ll keep testing in the future! Observe it…