I took advantage of the free time I had in hand this afternoon to run a connection test on StrongVPN in Windows 10, but the test found that none of the specific protocols could connect successfully, and then I ran a similar test on my iPhone and Macbook. The results were the same, I always thought that this October would be peaceful, and it hasn’t been, so far multiple VPNs have been found to be unable to connect, even with manual configuration. Here are the results of today’s test, which I’ll be posting broken down by different devices, protocols, networks…

Today’s test will be performed on StrongVPN in Macbook/MocOS devices, using the app’s direct connection for three latitudes: server connection success rate, speed after wall connection, and server connection aging. The speed test is mainly performed using the two tools SpeedTest and Netflix Fast, while depending on the specific case maybe I will also introduce YouTube Connection Speed into the reference for the speed test. If you have any questions or need to discuss anything, you can browse at the bottom of the article. Also hopefully this test will provide some objectivity for our readers…

Today I’m going to conduct a mainland China wall test of StrongVPN using the IKEv2 protocol on Window 10. In the limited time I have, I’ll try to write up the test process and results in as much detail as possible so that I can help you better understand how it actually works in China. For the speed test will use two tools, Speed Test and Netflix Fast, and Fast’s speed can roughly be used as a reference for YouTube connection speed. If you have any questions, please leave a comment and other readers will also be eager to answer the questions you encounter…

24 servers were tested this time over the wall! Today’s test of StrongVPN has two main purposes, the first is to let readers know if this VPN can help mainland Chinese users flip over firewalls under the current state of firewalls in China. The second is to find the faster nodes by testing more experienced servers so that we can try to connect for reference and save valuable time. I would like to thank many readers for their valuable testing suggestions, and I will continue to test and improve my methods so that I can give readers more useful information after reading.

It has been about 10 days since the last test because now I use a rotating test method for various VPNs, which can reduce my work pressure. Today I will test the connection success rate and speed of StrongVPN’s IKEv2 protocol in Windows 10. I try my best to test some servers, and at the same time, I will tell you as many test conditions and data as possible, so that you can use it as an auxiliary reference…

Today I will be wall testing connections for all of StrongVPN’s protocols in the Windows version. The main focus of this will be on the IKEv2 protocol for detailed testing, with a quick test of OpenVPN, WireGuard, OpenVPN, SSTP, and L2TP. The main purpose of such testing is to find out how to use a flip-wall connection other than the IKEv2 protocol. Since the October crackdown is approaching, it’s time to prepare for it. I hope to find more ways or techniques to do this through this test. For your reference…

We tested StrongVPN in Windows 10 using the IKEv2 protocol and it has a very high connection success rate and a very short server feedback time. However, the actual speed is very poor at the moment. I don’t know if StrongVPN will be able to solve this problem as soon as possible. StrongVPN was tested in Windows 10 using the WireGuard protocol, which is currently not available for flip-flop connections.