March 1, 2021 test, today is the second test of PureVPN after the big upgrade, this test I will test PureVPN in Windows, iPhone, Macbook three devices using IKEv2 connection protocol, the test to Windows mainly, iPhone and Macbook as a supplement. An overall look at PureVPN’s APP connection to different devices in mainland China. As there is no Android device in hand, I can’t test it. I hope PureVPN for Android can provide some usage and experience sharing in the comment section.
Follow the Twitter account to be the first to get the latest VPN test notifications: 10Beasts_Barry
PureVPN Last 6 test reports: [See More]
Checking out multiple test reports can help you understand more effectively how this VPN works in the long run.
- PureVPN Win10 New/Old Version test-2021/7/7 - July 7, 2021 China VPN test, today will be in Windows 10 devices for PureVPN old and new version comparison test, the test will use Auto and IKEv2 two…
- PureVPN Win10 test in China-2021/6/15 - June 15, 2021 China VPN test, today will test the Windows version of PureVPN, this test PureVPN version is 8.0.0.8, VPN connection protocol will use A…
- PureVPN iPhone 3 Protocol Test in China - May 27, 2021 China VPN test, today I will test the international universal version of PureVPN's APP in IOS/iPhone for mainland China. the IOS version …
- PureVPN Windows test in China-2021/5/24 - May 24, 2021 China VPN real test, in 11 days is the day of network blockade, according to the practice of the past years. China network blockade will …
- PureVPN Win10 Test in China-2021/04/26 - April 26, 2021 test report, today will be another test of PureVPN on Windows 10 for the IKEv2 protocol, this is already my 125th test report on PureVP…
- PureVPN Windows10 IKEv2 Test in China - April 7, 2021 - Today will be a test of the IKEv2 protocol in PureVPN's App in Windows 10. Before testing I checked the latest version of PureVPN and …
Starting Time: Mar 1, 2021, 10:37 AM
Local device and network: Windows10/300M Telecom/WiFi;
PureVPN Version: 1.1.74.0;
Protocol: IKEv2;
Servers: Random;
USA – Los Angeles: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 25s)
Speedtest Ping: 151ms; Download: 0.91Mbps; Upload: 33.41Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 18276Kbps;
USA – Chicago: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 30s)
Speedtest Ping: 244ms; Download: 1.19Mbps; Upload: 4.51Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 11195Kbps;
USA – Ashburm: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 14s)
Speedtest Ping: 225ms; Download: 0.96Mbps; Upload: 37.87Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 11195Kbps;
USA – San Francisco: Failed; (Try once, Error: 5012)
USA – Seattle: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 36s)
Speedtest Ping: 193ms; Download: 0.72Mbps; Upload: 35.39Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 22016Kbps;
USA – New Jersey: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 24s)
Speedtest Ping: 226ms; Download: 7.14Mbps; Upload: 34.48Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 21281Kbps;
USA – Houston: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 25s)
Speedtest Ping: 234ms; Download: 0.88Mbps; Upload: 34.79Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 10774Kbps;
USA – Miami: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 29s)
Speedtest Ping: 232ms; Download: 0.89Mbps; Upload: 35.66Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 10588Kbps;
UK(GB) – London: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 16s)
Speedtest Ping: 220ms; Download: 0.95Mbps; Upload: 36.52Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 10872Kbps;
UK(GB) – Manchester: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 12s)
Speedtest Ping: 246ms; Download: 1.17Mbps; Upload: 27.66Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 11128Kbps;
Germany – Frankurt: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 27s)
Speedtest Ping: 235ms; Download: 3.16Mbps; Upload: 5.43Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 1355Kbps;
Canada – Vancouver: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 37s)
Speedtest Ping: 176ms; Download: 1.75Mbps; Upload: 34.11Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 14058Kbps;
中午午休时间我依然连着这个Canada – Vancouver服务器, 如下图所示, 一共连接时间为1小时31分, 中途并未出现掉线的情况。
Australia – Sydney: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 27s)
Speedtest Ping: 230ms; Download: 0.51Mbps; Upload: 24.95Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 7392Kbps;
Japan – Tokyo: Failed; (Try once, Error: 5012)
Taiwan – Taipei: Failed; (Try once, Error: 5012)
Singapore: Failed; (Try once, Error: 5012)
Vietnam – Hanoi: Failed; (Try once, Error: 5012)
Thailand – Bangkok: FIrst success; (Time efficiency: 45s)
Speedtest Ping: 431ms; Download: 0.29Mbps; Upload: 27.72Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 7392Kbps;
Windows Summary: The above connection test was conducted on PureVPN’s International Universal App in Windows 10. A total of 18 servers were randomly selected, and 13 of them were successfully connected. After the test, I feel that the success rate of VPN servers in the Americas and Europe is higher, while those in Asia seem to be lower. It is gratifying to see that all the successful servers have good YouTube connection speed, most of them can reach 10000Kbps and above. It is worth noting that the download speed of SpeedTest test is poor, as to why there is a very good speed of YouTube, and SpeedTest download speed is very poor test results I do not understand, but the fact that the test results are so.
Windows10 PureVPN Version: 1.1.74.0 Protocol: IKEv2
Today’s Test Score: ★ ★ ★ ★
Local device and network: IOS/300M China Telecom/WiFi/China Mobile 4G;
PureVPN Version: 8.13.2;
Protocol: IKEv2;
Servers: Random;
USA – New York: First success; (Try once)
USA – Chicago: First success; (Try two times)
USA – Los Angeles: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Houston: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Ashburn: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Washington DC: First success; (Try once)
USA – Salt Lake City: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – San Francisco: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Miami: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Seattle: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Phoenix: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – New Jersey: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
USA – Atlanta: First success; (Try once)
UK – London: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
UK – Manchester: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
Netherlands – Amsterdam: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
Germany – Frankfurt: Failed; (Try once，Error: 408)
Local device and network: MacOS/300M China Telecom/WiFi;
PureVPN Version: 3.0.19 (725);
Protocol: IKEv2;
Servers: Random;
USA – Ashburn: Failed; (Try once)
USA – Atlanta: First success; (Time efficiency: 15s)
Speedtest Ping: 211ms; Download: 13.9Mbps; Upload: 15.2Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 23415Kbps;
USA – Chicago: Failed; (Try once)
USA – Houston: Failed; (Try once)
USA – Los Angeles: First success; (Time efficiency: 4s)
Speedtest Ping: 150ms; Download: 1.23Mbps; Upload: 31.1Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 16537Kbps;
USA – Miami: Failed; (Try once)
USA – New Jersey: Failed; (Try once)
USA – New York: First success; (Time efficiency: 13s)
Speedtest Ping: 285ms; Download: 0.94Mbps; Upload: 13.4Mbps;
YouTube Connection Speed: 6985Kbps;
IOS/MacOS Summary: I tested a small sample of PureVPN servers using IKEv2 protocol in iPhone and Macbook above. I found that its connection success rate is lower than that of Windows, but it is not impossible to connect successfully, there are some servers that can be connected, and the speed of YouTube is good after successful connection. In addition I have not yet tested the Automatic protocol option for Windows, IOS, MacOS systematically, in IOS I have privately selected 4 servers in the US region at random to connect, and one of them connected successfully. What I can do is just a guide and reference, I hope you will not be limited by any comments or official suggestions, and try various protocols and different servers for connection attempts. If you are willing, please share your experience with more people by leaving a comment. Thank you! The message board of this blog is anonymous, just fill in a nickname + comment content, so don’t worry about leaking your private information.
MacOS PureVPN Version: 3.0.19 (725) Protocol: IKEv2
IOS PureVPN Version: 8.13.2 Protocol: IKEv2
Today’s Test Score: ★ ★ ★
