January 4, 2022 China VPN test, today we will test the connection and speed of ExpressVPN’s Automatic protocol option in Macbook devices in mainland China and record it in video mode. The servers for the test are firstly the 6 officially recommended servers, then we will select the servers in the “Recommended” list of the app for connection test, and finally we will randomly check some servers in the “All” server list for connection test. Finally, we will randomly check some servers in the “All” server list for connection test, and the test will mainly be conducted on servers in the U.S. region, supplemented by servers in other regions. The speed test will be conducted using the SpeedTest tool.
The daily speed test will help you understand three things.
1. the success rate of the VPN’s server connection in the device under test.
2. the server connection time of the VPN in the tested device.
3. the speed of the VPN after a successful connection to the server in the device under test.
Follow the Twitter account to be the first to get the latest VPN test notifications: 10Beasts_Barry
ExpressVPN last 6 test reports: [See More]
Checking out multiple test reports can help you understand more effectively how this VPN works in the long run.
- ExpressVPN Android Test in China Report – 20220524 - May 24, 2022 China VPN test, since the test report on the 10th of this month has been 14 days without ExpressVPN test. During that time Macbook, iPhone, and Windows, the three devices I commonly use, were confirmed to be working properly. Today I will be conducting a connection and speed test of ExpressVPN on my Android device. I hope that this test will give readers a better understanding of how ExpressVPN actually works in mainland China. If you have any questions, please leave a comment (anonymous) to communicate.
- ExpressVPN Windows test in China-20220510 - May 10, 2022 China VPN test, today will be a massive server spot check test of ExpressVPN's Automatic protocol option in Windows devices, the complete process of this test will be recorded via video recording software. The advantage of recording the screen is that it can be more intuitive to show the whole connection process to the reader, so that the reader can feel more intuitive, the VPN in the actual use of the process is a kind of experience. This test was conducted through SpeedTest for speed testing. If you have any questions, you can leave a message (anonymous) to communicate...
- ExpressVPN Win/Mac/iOS Test in China/20220421 - China VPN test on April 21, 2022. A field test of ExpressVPN for mainland China will be conducted today in Windows, Macbook, and iOS (iPhone). The test ExpressVPN has been checked and upgraded to the latest version, the specific version number will be explained in the test below. ExpressVPN is currently the most stable and secure sVPN in China, bar none. Even during the most severe blocking period there was only a brief (24 hours) or so connection difficulties or speed drops. If you have any questions, you can leave an anonymous message to communicate.
- Best 4 VPN in China, OMG, Just only one！ - On March 21, 2022, China VPN test will be conducted on a Windows 10 device today. The test VPNs include ExpressVPN, PureVPN, StrongVPN, and AtlasVPN. If there is enough time, we will test others. Each VPN will indicate its App version number, connection protocol and other information at the beginning before the test. As a result, the number of VPNs tested this time is large, so each VPN will usually randomly check 5-10 servers in different regions. If there are officially recommended servers, it will be explained in the test. If you have any questions, you can leave a message (anonymous) to communicate.
- Windows11 ExpressVPN Test in China at two sessions night - March 5, 2022. It is the first day of China's "Fifth Session of the Thirteenth National People's Congress", and this time of year is China's VPN block period. There are roughly three more severe lockdown periods in a year, in March, June and October. Occasionally, it happens occasionally. I remember that the March blockade last year (2021) and the year before (2020) was not very serious, and it passed in roughly 2-3 days. During the blocking period, most VPNs only experienced some server failures and a slight slowdown. But this lockdown I feel worse than before...
- Today 1:00 PM, ExpressVPN has difficulty connecting in China - February 21, 2022 China VPN connection test, as just the beginning of the year themselves have a lot of work at hand need to do, so this site's test is not so much time. However, in the course of their usual use will still be concerned about the use of each VPN. This time, we will test ExpressVPN's Chinese server connection and speed after connection in Windows and Macbook. I hope this test will provide some reference for readers. If you have any questions, you can leave a message (anonymous) to exchange...
Starting Time: Jan 4, 2022, 12:50 PM
Local device and network: China Telecom 300M / Macbook；
Protocol: Automatic；
Official Deals: New User Free 3 Months
Test’s Servers: Official recommend six servers and other；
ExpressVPN Macbook Record Screen
The entire recorded video is 40 minutes and 56 seconds, and you can watch it in YouTube at 2x speed. The video is unedited and silent. Below the video is the actual test and speed report of the 28 servers tested. I have a question about the YouTube video, I use the automatic recording software of my Macbook to record it and watch it in Mac with high definition, but why upload it to YouTube, the definition becomes so low. Please guide me if it is the size of the recorded video, or the recording software, or if there is some setting that I missed when uploading.
USA – New York: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 227ms. Download: 285Mbps. Upload: 11.4Mbps;
USA – Los Angeles – 5: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s) – Official Recommend
Speedtest Ping: 156ms. Download: 203Mbps. Upload: 20.8Mbps;
Note: This server had one dropped connection during testing and then automatically connected successfully again.
USA – Santa Monica: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s) – Official Recommend
Speedtest Ping: 149ms. Download: 77.7Mbps. Upload: 26.6Mbps;
Japan – Yokohama: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s) – Official Recommend
Speedtest Ping: 161ms. Download: 275Mbps. Upload: 17.3Mbps;
France – Alsace: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s) – Official Recommend
Speedtest Ping: 161ms. Download: 147Mbps. Upload: 17.1Mbps;
UK – Wembley: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s) – Official Recommend
Speedtest Ping: 264ms. Download: 141Mbps. Upload: 26.3Mbps;
Singapore – Marina Bay: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s) – Official Recommend
Speedtest Ping: 325ms. Download: 231Mbps. Upload: 12.7Mbps;
Canada – Toronto – 2: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 227ms. Download: 315Mbps. Upload: 11.5Mbps;
Germany – Nuremberg: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 237ms. Download: 66.1Mbps. Upload: 10.6Mbps;
Note: This server had one dropped connection during testing and then automatically connected successfully again.
Australia – Sydney: Success; (Time efficiency: >10s)
Speedtest Ping: 987ms. Download: 1.18Mbps. Upload: 4.73Mbps;
Japan – Tokyo – 2: Failed;
USA – San Francisco: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 150ms. Download: 325Mbps. Upload: 9.96Mbps;
USA – Chicago: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 194ms. Download: 265Mbps. Upload: 17.3Mbps;
USA – Washington DC: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 243ms. Download: 261Mbps. Upload: 20Mbps;
USA – Dallas: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 63ms. Download: 308Mbps. Upload: 9.81Mbps;
USA – Miami: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 220ms. Download: 42.2Mbps. Upload: 14.1Mbps;
Note: This server had one dropped connection during testing and then automatically connected successfully again.
USA – Los Angeles – 3: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 139ms. Download: 315Mbps. Upload: 11.4Mbps;
USA – New Jersey – 1: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 216ms. Download: 104Mbps. Upload: 11.4Mbps;
Note: This server had one dropped connection during testing and then automatically connected successfully again.
USA – Los Angeles – 2: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 162ms. Download: 269Mbps. Upload: 16.4Mbps;
USA – Tampa – 1: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 335ms. Download: 245Mbps. Upload: 22.6Mbps;
USA – Atlanta: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 306ms. Download: 265Mbps. Upload: 11.7Mbps;
Hong Kong – 2: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 269ms. Download: 302Mbps. Upload: 2.02Mbps;
Hong Kong – 1: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 292ms. Download: 138Mbps. Upload: 9.53Mbps;
South Korea – 2: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 290ms. Download: 138Mbps. Upload: 12.8Mbps;
Thailand: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 265ms. Download: 315Mbps. Upload: 14.6Mbps;
Taiwan – 3: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 287ms. Download: 81.5Mbps. Upload: 2.02Mbps;
Italy – Milan: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 283ms. Download: 23.9Mbps. Upload: 28.4Mbps;
Note: This server had one dropped connection during testing and then automatically connected successfully again.
Turkey: Success; (Time efficiency: <10s)
Speedtest Ping: 268ms. Download: 285Mbps. Upload: 8.69Mbps;
Summary: The above tests were conducted on 28 servers, 27 of which were successfully connected, and 5 of which had one dropped connection. It should also be noted that the “Time efficiency” of today’s note may not be very accurate, and is only for reference. According to the previous testing experience, the test results can also be used as a reference for Windows, IOS and Android devices.
Today’s “Time efficiency” Rating：★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Today’s “Server Connection” Rating：★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Today’s “Speed after connection” Rating：★ ★ ★ ★
