Site icon Beast Net

AtlasVPN iOS/iPhone First Test in China

2021 August 13 China VPN wall flip test, two days before that I carried out a wall flip test on Windows 10 and Macbook continuously. It should be noted here that AtlasVPN is a relatively new VPN, its inception should be in 2020, and compared to established VPN providers like ExpressVPN, this VPN is relatively single in terms of features. So why should I test such a VPN? First of all, of course, because it does help users in mainland China to achieve VPN connections, and secondly, it is a US-based service provider, which I think guarantees the safety of life and privacy in mainland China. As for whether it can provide stable VPN service in the long run, I can’t judge it now, this point needs my long-term continuous testing and observation to know.


Starting Time: Aug 13, 2021, 1:45 PM
Local device and network: China Telecom 300M and 4G / IOS-iPhone;
Protocol: Default;
Version: 3.2.1
Official Deals: New user $1.39/m
Server: Random;

Australia – Sydney: First success; (Time efficiency: 8s) 
Speedtest Ping: 287ms. Download: 207Mbps. Upload: 1.75Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 360p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 4065Kbps;

Austria – Vienna: First success; (Time efficiency: 6s) 
Speedtest Ping: 228ms. Download: 260Mbps. Upload: 3.18Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 480p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 1501Kbps;

Belgium – Brussels: Failed
Bulgaria – Sofia: Failed
Canada – Montreal: First success; (Time efficiency: 6s) 
Speedtest Ping: 215ms. Download: 249Mbps. Upload: 0.16Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 480p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 7694Kbps;

Czech Republic – Prague: First success; (Time efficiency: 5s) 
Speedtest Ping: 237ms. Download: 237Mbps. Upload: 3.15Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 480p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 10519Kbps;

France – Paris: First success; (Time efficiency: 4s) 
Speedtest Ping: 255ms. Download: 175Mbps. Upload: 1.97Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 360p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 10771Kbps;

Germany – Frankfurt: First success; (Time efficiency: 4s) 
Speedtest Ping: 243ms. Download: 221Mbps. Upload: 1.9Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 360p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 14343Kbps;

Japan – Tokyo: First success; (Time efficiency: 5s) 
Speedtest Ping: 153ms. Download: 49.1Mbps. Upload: 4.66Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 1080p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 3610Kbps;

UK – London: First success; (Time efficiency: 5s) 
Speedtest Ping: 237ms. Download: 6.02Mbps. Upload: 4.28Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 360p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 3251Kbps;

USA – Dallas: Failed
USA – Las Vegas: First success; (Time efficiency: 5s) 
Speedtest Ping: 144ms. Download: 10.6Mbps. Upload: 6.89Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 480p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 5523Kbps;

USA – Los Angeles: First success; (Time efficiency: 5s) 
Speedtest Ping: 142ms. Download: 317Mbps. Upload: 1.98Mbps;
Speedtest Video: 1440p;
YouTube Connection Speed: 34980Kbps;

Summary: I also counted the servers in the list in the AtlasVPN app for iPhone, 37 in total, which was the same number in Windows 10 and Macbook before. I tested 13 of them, and 10 of them connected successfully. The servers that could connect successfully had a Time efficiency of 5s, which is good. In the test, I took screenshots of each test screen and then uploaded them to Word on my Macbook. So the time is continuous from a single screenshot.

    From the test results of the three devices (Windows 10, Macbook, iPhone), it looks like it is performing well so far. Here I would also like to say a word of concern about this VPN, since it was born in a relatively short time, will it not be able to carry the GFW blocking blow and lose in the first wave of the blocking period and fall flat on its face! I have this concern, but let’s just stick to the facts and keep testing and observing it to evaluate it without bias. If you are looking for a long term stable VPN then my first choice would be to suggest ExpressVPN, and if you are looking for a backup solution then AtlasVPN is also a good choice.

Server connection success rate: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Time efficiency success rate: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Speed success rate: ★ ★ ★ ☆


Exit mobile version